The Lord’s Day

Sunday; the first day of the week; “the Christian Sabbath” in Reformed usage

Every first day of the week (Sunday)

Paul tells the Corinthians to put money aside “upon the first day of the week”, as he had ordered the churches of Galatia. It is the first mention in the record of a regular first-day practice.

The disciples are “gathered together to break bread” on the first day of the week, and Paul preaches to them until midnight. Luke gives it as the church’s custom, not as a special occasion.

John writes that he was in the Spirit “on the Lord’s day”. The Greek adjective is the one Paul uses for the Lord’s supper (1 Corinthians 11:20). Some Sabbatarians read the phrase as the seventh day or as the day of the Lord at the end; the church writers who follow John use it for a day the church kept, and Justin names that day Sunday (H4, H8, H7).

A church manual of uncertain date, in its 14th chapter, orders the Christian assembly, with the Supper, on the Lord’s day, after confession of sins. The Greek has the adjective “Lord’s” and leaves the noun to be supplied, as Greek often did with this word; translators supply “day”.

every Lord's day gather yourselves together, and break bread

Writing to the church at Magnesia (Magnesians 9), he says that believers raised in the old order came to a new hope, “no longer observing the Sabbath”, and lived by “the Lord’s”. The word after it is disputed. The one surviving Greek manuscript reads “living according to the Lord’s life”; a medieval Latin version has no word for “life”, and translations that follow it, such as the one at New Advent, supply “Day”. The passage shows Christians who had stopped keeping the Sabbath. It cannot be counted a sure witness to the Lord’s day.

Reports to the emperor that Christians questioned in his province said they met on a fixed day before dawn to sing to Christ and bind themselves to a pure life. He does not name the day, so this shows a regular meeting and not which day.

He describes the weekly assembly for outsiders: readings from the apostles and the prophets, a sermon, prayers, the Supper and a collection for the needy. He is the first to call the day Sunday and gives two reasons, the first day of creation and the resurrection.

Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead.

Dionysius, bishop of Corinth, writes to the church at Rome that his church has just kept the Lord’s day, on which it read their letter aloud. Melito, bishop of Sardis, one of the seven churches John wrote to in Revelation, writes a book On the Lord’s Day, now lost. Both are known from Eusebius. Neither names the weekday; Justin, writing at Rome a little earlier, does (H7).

Today we have passed the Lord's holy day, in which we have read your epistle.

Orders judges, city people and craftsmen to rest on “the venerable day of the sun”, and exempts farm work. This is a civil law about a day Christians had met on for more than two centuries. It is the root of the popular claim that Sunday was imposed on the church (H14).

Canon 29 forbids Christians to rest on the Sabbath, tells them to work on that day and honor the Lord’s day, and to rest on the Lord’s day if they can. It shows that some in Asia Minor still rested on Saturday in the 4th century, that the council took Sunday to be the church’s day, and that a rest rule was now being attached to it, which the New Testament never does. The date is uncertain: the introduction at New Advent, following Hefele, places the council between 343 and 381; others put it about 363.

Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath

States the Reformed view that the Sabbath was changed to the first day at the resurrection and is to be kept “as the Christian Sabbath”, with a holy rest all the day. It differs from this page: it carries the fourth commandment over to Sunday.

from the resurrection of Christ, was changed into the first day of the week, which, in Scripture, is called the Lord’s Day, and is to be continued to the end of the world, as the Christian Sabbath.

Small Baptist congregations in England conclude that the seventh day is the Sabbath for Christians. The first church of the tradition in North America is founded at Newport, Rhode Island, in late 1671.

A retired sea captain, he reads a tract on the Sabbath in 1845 and accepts the seventh day. In 1846 he writes a tract of his own. James and Ellen White read it and accept the seventh-day Sabbath that year. The Seventh-day Adventist Church grew from this circle.

Teaches that the Sabbath was changed by the papacy, which took the seal from the law. The claim does not fit the record: Sunday assembly is in the New Testament and in the Didache and Justin (H1 to H7), long before Constantine or any bishop of Rome could impose it. Adventist scholar Samuele Bacchiocchi (1977) argued instead that Rome led a gradual shift in the 2nd century; other scholars, including the Grace Communion International writer who answers him, find Sunday attested in Syria, Asia Minor and Egypt as early as Rome.

When the Sabbath was changed by the papal power, the seal was taken from the law.

Writing in a paper read in the Churches of Christ, he says the Lord’s Supper is the memorial Christ asked for, and that the disciples kept it on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7). The church may not add holy days the Scriptures do not authorize, and he reads Colossians 2:16 as Paul’s warning against keeping the Jewish holy days. It is one writer’s view; the churches have no official statement.

And we are told that the early disciples did this regularly, upon the first day of the week.

Says that on Sundays and other holy days of obligation the faithful are obliged to participate in the Mass. It adds that they are to abstain from works and affairs that hinder the worship to be rendered to God, the joy proper to the Lord’s day, or the suitable relaxation of mind and body.

On Sundays and other holy days of obligation, the faithful are obliged to participate in the Mass.

Calls the Sunday Eucharist the foundation and confirmation of all Christian practice. It says the faithful are obliged to take part on days of obligation, unless excused for a serious reason, such as illness or the care of infants, or dispensed by their own pastor. It says those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin.

Those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin.

September 2023 (survey of July 11 - August 2, 2022)

A national survey of 1,031 adult Catholics (margin of error plus or minus 4.45 points). CARA reports that 17 percent attend Mass at least once a week, and that before the pandemic, 24 percent of Catholics attended weekly in 2019. Another 5 percent were then watching Mass on television or online because of the pandemic. Eighteen percent attend less than weekly but at least monthly, 26 percent a few times a year, and 35 percent rarely or never.

Seventeen percent of adult Catholics attends Mass at least once a week.

June 16, 2025 (survey of February 3-9, 2025)

A Pew survey of 9,544 U.S. adults, including 1,787 Catholics, finds that 28 percent of U.S. Catholics go to Mass weekly. CARA’s lower figure (H18) comes from a different date, method and wording; on both, most U.S. Catholics are not at Mass every Sunday.

28% say they go to Mass weekly.

Every early writer ties the first day to the resurrection. Justin adds the first day of creation (H7). The question that divides readers is how the church came to meet on that day, and what the day is.

The New Testament answer is that the apostles’ churches met on it from the start (H1, H2) and that it is the Lord’s own day (H3). The disagreement is about what comes after. Reformed churches say the fourth commandment moved to Sunday (H11). Catholics say Sunday fulfills the Sabbath and “its ceremonial observance replaces that of the sabbath” (Catechism 2175). Sabbatarians say no text moves anything, which is right, and conclude that the seventh day still binds (H12, H13). This page holds with the first sentence of the Sabbatarians and not the second: no text moves the Sabbath, because the Lord’s Day is not the Sabbath at all.

From the apostles

A 2nd-century shift at Rome (Bacchiocchi)

Imposed by Constantine or the papacy

Roman Catholics and the Eastern Orthodox

Lutherans, Anglicans, Methodists and most evangelicals

Presbyterian and Reformed churches, and some Reformed Baptists

The Seventh-day Adventist Church

Seventh Day Baptists and the Church of God (Seventh Day)

The Churches of God in the Armstrong tradition

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church

Jehovah’s Witnesses

The Churches of Christ

The Lord’s Supper and the collection

The pattern in the New Testament and in Justin (H2, H1, H7): the church assembles on the first day, breaks bread, teaches, prays and gives. Churches of Christ keep the Supper every first day. Catholic and Orthodox churches hold the Eucharist at the center of the day.

Sunday observance with a rest rule

Westminster Confession 21.8 calls for a holy rest “all the day from their own works, words, and thoughts about their worldly employments and recreations”, with works of necessity and mercy allowed. It is a Reformed addition to the New Testament pattern (A1, A5).

The Sabbath service

Adventists and Seventh Day Baptists hold worship and Bible study on Saturday, after preparation on Friday. Members decline Saturday work, and many Adventists close their businesses on that day.

The Messianic and Armstrong calendar

Messianic congregations add candle-lighting and the reading of the Torah to the Sabbath. Armstrong-tradition churches add the annual holy days of Leviticus 23.

Sunday closing laws

In McGowan v. Maryland (1961) the Supreme Court upheld Sunday closing laws on the ground that their purpose is now secular: “a uniform day of rest”. Most have since been relaxed.

Closing on Sunday

S. Truett Cathy closed his restaurant on Sundays in 1946 so that employees could rest and worship if they chose. Chick-fil-A still closes on Sunday.

The church gathered on the first day to break bread and to give

The apostles’ churches assembled on the first day, for the Supper and for the collection (S1, S2, S3).

At Troas the disciples were “gathered together to break bread” on the first day, and Luke tells it without surprise (S1). Paul orders the Corinthians, as he had ordered the churches of Galatia, to lay by in store on the first day of the week (S2). The risen Lord Himself met His disciples on the first day (S3), and met them again a week later (John 20:26).

Two things make this binding, not merely interesting. Apostolic example binds when the apostles direct it to the churches: Paul says he gave the same order to Galatia and to Corinth. And the Supper is joined to the church’s assembling (1 Corinthians 11:20), as at Troas. Taken alone, the first-day order about money (S2) does not say the church assembled; read with Acts 20:7 and with Justin, who names the collection in the Sunday assembly (H7), it fits. Acts 20:7 is also read as an evening meeting on the Saturday night; but Luke says the first day, and Paul left “on the morrow”.

The first day is the Lord’s day, as the Supper is the Lord’s supper

John names the Lord’s day (S4), and Paul names the Lord’s supper (S5): one word, for what the Lord appointed.

John was “in the Spirit on the Lord’s day” (S4). The Greek word for “Lord’s” there is the same word Paul uses of the Lord’s supper: “it is not possible to eat the Lord’s supper” when the church assembles (S5). Both belong to the Lord by His appointment. The writers after John use the word for a day the church kept: the Didache (H4), and by about 170 the bishop of Corinth and Melito of Sardis (H8). Justin names the day of the assembly Sunday (H7). Ignatius is often cited too, but the Greek of his sentence is disputed, and this page does not lean on it (H5).

Some read the phrase in Revelation 1:10 as the seventh-day Sabbath, because Jesus is “lord even of the sabbath” (Mark 2:28), or as the future day of the Lord. The Greek says “the Lord’s day”, with an adjective, and not “the day of the Lord” as in 1 Thessalonians 5:2. Within a century a bishop of Sardis, one of the churches John wrote to, wrote a book on the Lord’s day (H8). Even if one doubted this one verse, A1 stands without it.

Every Christian assembles

A Christian does not forsake the assembly of the church; it is not left to choice (S6).

The writer of Hebrews tells Christians not to forsake “our own assembling together, as the custom of some is”, and to keep exhorting one another (S6). The assembling of the church is part of the Christian’s life and is a duty to the whole body. This is why the conscience card on this page reads “given”, and not “free”. What the text leaves to each believer is how the rest of the day is spent, not whether to be with the church.

The ground: a command given to Israel binds a Christian only if the New Testament carries it over

The ten came as a covenant, and that covenant has given way; what binds the church is what Christ’s apostles teach (S7, S8, S9).

This page’s verdict rests on one premise, and it is stated here plainly: a command given to Israel binds a Christian only if the New Testament carries it over. The reason is in the text. The ten commandments were the covenant itself. Moses wrote on the tables “the words of the covenant, the ten commandments” (Exodus 34:28; Deuteronomy 4:13), and that covenant was made at Horeb with Israel (Deuteronomy 5:2-3). The New Testament says the covenant has changed, and the law with it: “the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law” (S7), and the first covenant is “nigh unto vanishing away” (S8). Paul says Christians were “discharged from the law”, and the law he names in the next breath is the tenth commandment, “Thou shalt not covet” (S9). The Christian is not lawless, but “under law to Christ” (1 Corinthians 9:21).

This does not throw away what the ten taught. What they required of love to God and to a neighbor, Christ and His apostles teach again: Romans 13:9 repeats the commands against adultery, killing, stealing and coveting, and Ephesians 6:2 the honor of parents. These bind the Christian because the new covenant teaches them. The fourth is the one of the ten the apostles never lay on a church, and Paul names the sabbath among the shadows (A6).

Adventists answer that the ten are “God’s unchangeable law”, a moral law set apart from the ceremonial laws that ended at the cross, and the United Church of God cites Paul: “the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and righteous, and good” (Romans 7:12), and faith does not make the law of none effect (Romans 3:31). All of that is true, and this page holds it: the law is holy, and nothing in it fails (S20). But Scripture does not divide the covenant written on the tables from the covenant that changed. It calls the tables themselves the covenant, and it is the ministry “written, and engraven on stones” that Paul says was passing away (S26). The question is not whether the law was good. It is which covenant a Christian is under, and what that covenant commands.

The Sabbath was God’s sign to Israel, not a command to the church

The Sabbath was given to Israel at Sinai, as a sign of the covenant, and the New Testament never lays it on Christians (S10, S11, S12).

Moses tells Israel that Jehovah commanded them to keep the sabbath, and recalls the bondage in Egypt as the reason (S10). The Levites’ prayer says that at Sinai God “madest known unto them thy holy sabbath” (S11). And the Lord Himself calls it a sign: “between me and the children of Israel for ever” (S12). Ezekiel says the same: “I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them” (Ezekiel 20:12).

Adventists read the same sign as God’s “perpetual sign of His eternal covenant between Him and His people”, the church included (Fundamental Belief 20). But the text names its parties, “the children of Israel”, and its covenant, the one made at Sinai “throughout their generations” (S12). A sign of that covenant stands or falls with it (A4). Sabbatarians also reply that God hallowed the seventh day at creation (Genesis 2:3), before Israel. The creation is the reason the commandment gives, but a reason for a command is not yet the command. Genesis records God’s rest, and no command to Adam to keep it (S18).

The Reformed answer is that the commandment moved to Sunday (H11). That grants the Sabbatarians the premise that the fourth commandment binds the Christian, and then supplies a transfer that no text states. The Lord’s Day passages show an assembly, with no rest rule (A1).

No one may judge a Christian by a sabbath day

Paul tells Christians not to be judged in a sabbath day, and warns the Galatians against turning back to days (S13, S14, S15).

“Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of a feast day or a new moon or a sabbath day: which are a shadow of the things to come; but the body is Christ’s” (S13). The three days are the yearly, monthly and weekly days that the Old Testament lists name together (1 Chronicles 23:31 has “on the sabbaths, on the new moons, and on the set feasts”). Adventists reply that Paul means ceremonial sabbaths only. Hosea 2:11 (“her feasts, her new moons, and her sabbaths”) shows that the weekly sabbath sits in this kind of list, so the plain reading includes it. Even if it meant only the ceremonial ones, no text would then command the seventh day of the Christian. The Church of the Great God reads “but the body is Christ’s” as the church, which is to judge how the days are kept. But Paul sets shadow against body, as Hebrews says the law had “a shadow of the good things to come” (Hebrews 10:1): the days are the shadow, and Christ is what cast it. And the verse begins with “therefore”, after Christ blotted out “the bond written in ordinances” and nailed it to the cross (Colossians 2:14).

In Galatians Paul rebukes Gentiles who were turning back to “days, and months, and seasons, and years” and fears his labor was in vain (S14). The United Church of God reads these as pagan days, since Gentiles could not turn back to feasts they had never kept. There is truth in that: Paul puts their old idolatry and the law together under “the weak and beggarly rudiments”, as he had said “we” Jews too were in bondage under them (Galatians 4:3). But the letter is written to those who “desire to be under the law” (Galatians 4:21), and the danger is taking up the law of Moses as a way to stand right with God, not Christians resting on a Saturday. This page does not rest its verdict on Galatians alone. Romans 14 gives the rule for the Christian’s own regard for a day: it is between the believer and the Lord, and each is to be “fully assured in his own mind” (S15). What the three texts forbid together is binding a day on a Christian and judging him by it.

A duty bound under grave sin, kept weekly by a minority

Hebrews 10:25 binds every Christian to assemble; the Catholic rule adds its own terms, and most of its people do not keep it weekly (S16).

The assembling is God’s command, and this page holds to it (S6, A3). The Catholic rule adds to it. Canon 1247 says the faithful “are obliged to participate in the Mass” on Sundays and other holy days of obligation (H16), and the Catechism says those who “deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin”, unless excused for a serious reason or dispensed by their own pastor (H17). Making Mass the one way to keep the day, adding holy days to it, and setting the church’s own excuses and dispensations is the church’s rule, not the text’s.

In 2022 CARA found 17 percent of adult Catholics at Mass weekly, against 24 percent in 2019, with another 5 percent then watching online or on television (H18). Pew found 28 percent in 2025 (H19). On either count most U.S. Catholics are not at Mass each Sunday. Some are excused by sickness or the care of infants, as the Catechism allows; the surveys do not say how many.

The Catholic answer is that the church holds the keys to bind and to loose (Matthew 16:19), and that a duty is not disproved because many fail it. The second part is true, and it is why the command to assemble stands whoever keeps it. But the Catholic rule claims more than that command, and a rule bound under grave sin that most of the church’s own people set aside is honored with the lips (S16). It shows itself the church’s tradition, not God’s. This weighs the claim to bind, not the Catholics who keep it or miss it.

The fourth commandment is among the ten God wrote with His own finger. It names the seventh day and grounds it in creation (verse 11), so it binds every person. No text repeals it. The Adventists and the Churches of God say this; Reformed churches agree it is a moral law and say the day moved.

The commandment was given to Israel at Sinai (S11), and Moses ties it to Israel’s deliverance from Egypt (S10). Its own reason from creation is real, but the reason is not the command. Nine of the Ten Words are taught again to Christians in the apostles’ letters; the fourth never is. The letters speak of the old covenant as passing away (2 Corinthians 3:7, Hebrews 8:13), and Paul says Christians were “discharged from the law” (Romans 7:6), and in the next verse his example of that law is the tenth commandment. Reformed teachers say the day moved to Sunday (H11); no text says so, and the Lord’s Day texts give an assembly and no rest rule (A1). The standard is what the New Testament gives Christians (A4, A5).

God blessed and hallowed the seventh day at creation, before there was an Israel. The Sabbath is a creation ordinance for all people, not a Jewish law.

This is the strongest argument for the Sabbatarian side, and it is answered fairly: the text says God rested and hallowed the day. It does not say Adam kept it, or that anyone was commanded to before the manna in Exodus 16:29, where Moses says Jehovah “hath given you the sabbath”. Nehemiah says God made it known at Sinai (S11). The day is God’s from creation; the command for people to keep it is the one given to Israel, as a sign (S12). Hebrews returns to this verse and draws a different lesson (S22).

“The sabbath was made for man.” Man means mankind, not Jews alone, so the Sabbath is for all. Jesus kept it Himself, and His followers “rested according to the commandment” after the cross (Luke 23:56). The United Church of God says the New Testament shows no change.

Jesus is answering the Pharisees’ rules about what is lawful on the day, and says why God made it: for people’s good, and not as a burden. It does not say the day was laid on Gentile Christians. In the same breath Jesus says He is “lord even of the sabbath”, the one with authority over it. He kept it, as He kept the whole law, because He was “born under the law” (Galatians 4:4) and lived before the covenant changed at His death (Colossians 2:14). The women who rested in Luke 23:56 did so on the Saturday between the cross and the resurrection, before the church began at Pentecost. What the church keeps after that is learned from the apostles (A4, A1).

Jesus did not come to destroy the law, and not a jot or tittle will pass. The Ten Commandments therefore still bind, and the Sabbath is one of them.

Jesus says He came “to fulfil”, and that the law stands “till all things be accomplished”. That is the point: He accomplished it. Paul says Christians were “discharged from the law” (Romans 7:6). The verse does not say the covenant at Sinai binds the church; it says nothing in it fails, because Christ fulfils it. What He taught Christians, the apostles repeat (A5).

In the new creation “from one sabbath to another” all flesh worships God. So the Sabbath goes on forever, and is not a law that ended at the cross.

The same sentence names the new moon. If this verse binds the Sabbath on Christians, it binds the new moon too, and no Sabbatarian church keeps new moons. Isaiah pictures the nations worshiping God in the forms his hearers knew, and he does not give the church a command for this age. The place to learn what the church keeps is the apostles’ letters (A1, A6).

“There remaineth therefore a sabbath rest for the people of God.” The Greek word means Sabbath-keeping, and it remains for Christians.

Read the whole passage (verses 3-11). The rest is God’s own rest, which “we who have believed do enter”, offered “To-day”, and which Joshua did not give. The writer quotes Genesis 2:2 to show that the rest God entered is the pattern, and then calls Christians to “give diligence to enter into that rest”. He who enters it has “rested from his works”: it is a rest entered by faith (verse 3), not a day of the week.

Paul and the apostles went to the synagogue “every sabbath” after the cross, so the apostles still kept the Sabbath.

Luke says Paul reasoned in the synagogue to persuade Jews and Greeks. He went where the Jews and the Gentile God-fearers gathered. Elsewhere he says he became as a Jew to the Jews to win them (1 Corinthians 9:20). Luke does not say that he rested on the day or that the church met on it. When he records the church’s own assembly, it is on the first day (S1). In Acts 13:42-44 the people ask to hear the word “the next sabbath”, because that was when the synagogue met.

Daniel foretold a power that “shall think to change the times and the law”. Adventists hold that this is the change of the Sabbath to Sunday, and the church’s website says it came with Constantine’s law of 321 (H9; see H14).

The vision names no day, and the power in it speaks against the Most High and wears out “the saints of the Most High”. To read Sunday into the verse, one must first show that the church changed its day after the apostles. The record shows the opposite: the church met on the first day in the New Testament (S1), and in the Didache and Justin long before Constantine (H4, H7). Constantine’s law gave a civil rest to a day the church already kept (H9). Whatever power Daniel meant, the first-day assembly is not its work.

When the apostles decided what to lay on Gentile Christians, they named “these necessary things”, and the Sabbath is not among them. Christians are not under the Sabbath.

This is weighty, but it is not a text on the Sabbath. The council was answering whether Gentiles had to be circumcised and keep the law of Moses (verses 1 and 5), and some Sabbatarians answer that verse 21, which says Moses is read in the synagogues every sabbath, takes Sabbath-keeping for granted. But the verse is commonly read as the reason for the four abstentions, out of regard for the Jews who heard Moses read; it does not add a fifth. The decision to lay “no greater burden” fits the rest of the case (A5, A6), and needs no more than that.

Paul calls the Ten Words, “written, and engraven on stones”, a ministration of death whose glory was passing away. So the covenant that held the Sabbath is gone.

Adventists and the United Church of God reply that Paul calls the law holy elsewhere (Romans 7:12), and that what is passing is the ministry that condemns, not the commandments. That is right as far as it goes. But Paul says the stone-engraved ministry was “passing away”, and the writer of Hebrews says the first covenant is “becoming old” and nearly gone (Hebrews 8:13). The commandments that bind Christians are those the New Testament teaches again to Christians. The nine are; the fourth is not (A5). The Sabbath binds a Christian if the apostles carry it over, and they do not.

The sabbaths, new moons and set feasts make a fixed list in the Old Testament of the yearly, monthly and weekly days. Paul’s list in Colossians 2:16 names the same three, so “a sabbath day” is the weekly one.

The pattern is strong: Hosea 2:11 has the same order as Paul’s list, and Ezekiel 45:17 names the three again. Adventists reply that Leviticus 23:38 sets “the sabbaths of Jehovah” apart from the feast sabbaths, and that the lists name sabbaths in the plural. It is a fair argument, and this page rests nothing on it alone. If “sabbath day” in Colossians 2:16 includes the weekly Sabbath, Paul has told Christians not to be judged by it (A6). If it does not, the commandment is still never laid on the church, and Galatians 4:9-11 and Romans 14:5-6 still stand. The verdict needs one premise, which this page states and argues from the text: a command given to Israel binds Christians only if the New Testament carries it over (A4).

Study

• Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2 name the first day, and Hebrews 10:25 calls Christians not to forsake the assembly. What would be lost if the church met whenever it pleased?
• The Sabbath was a “sign between me and the children of Israel” (Exodus 31:17). What does it mean for a command to be a sign of a covenant, and what does Hebrews say happens to that covenant?
• Reformed churches say the fourth commandment moved to Sunday; Adventists say it never moved; this page says a command given to Israel binds a Christian only if the New Testament carries it over (A4). Which step does each view need, and which texts supply it?
• Colossians 2:17 calls the days “a shadow of the things to come”. If the weekly sabbath is among them, what is the “body”?
• Read Hebrews 4:3-11 as one passage. What rest is the writer calling Christians to enter?
• Constantine’s law of 321 and the Council of Laodicea come centuries after Acts 20:7. Do they prove the day, or only show that it was already kept?

The Marian Feasts

All Saints, All Souls and Halloween

Reformation Day

Christmas

More illuminations · Harbinger's Lamp